What's the deal with renaming files in Git?
June 11, 2016
If you try renaming a file in your project, you might notice this weird behaviour when checking its status: `$ git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with ‘origin/master’.
Changes not staged for commit: (use “git add/rm …” to update what will be committed) (use “git checkout — …” to discard changes in working directory)
Untracked files: (use “git add …” to include in what will be committed)
no changes added to commit (use “git add” and/or “git commit -a”)`
Why is this happening?
The short answer is: Git relies on names to know if whether a file is tracked or not. When you rename a file, Git believes the original file got deleted and suddenly there’s a new file in which it knows nothing about. Hence the untracked status.
Alternative: rename with Git
If you want to avoid this behaviour, you could simply use the native Git command: git mv `$ git mv README.md README-NEW.md $ git status On branch master Your branch is up-to-date with ‘origin/master’.
Changes to be committed: (use “git reset HEAD …” to unstage)
renamed: README.md -> README-NEW.md`
Nice and easy.
I’m a Brazilian front-end developer living in London. This website features some of my latest projects and my thoughts on anything web related.
You can find me on Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn.